Transitioning Away from Git

Git has long been the dominant distributed version control system (DVCS) for software development. However, as projects evolve, some teams find Git’s learning curve steep, its workflows complex, or its performance issues limiting, especially with extraordinarily large codebases or non-linear histories.

Searching for alternatives—like Mercurial, Perforce, Fossil, or even cloud-integrated systems—can make sense. In this article, we explore why teams are moving away from Git, review notable Git alternatives, outline migration strategies, and share best practices for a smooth transition.

More Read: Top 10 Online Tools to Convert Markdown to HTML

1. Common Reasons to Move Beyond Git

Performance and Scalability

Large repositories with enormous histories or binary assets can slow Git operations like commits, clones, diffs, and checkouts. Teams working with Unreal, Unity, large media files, or firmware sometimes experience performance bottlenecks. These teams may need systems better optimized for handling large file sizes and histories.

Workflow Complexity

Git’s powerful branching and merging capabilities come with added complexity. Tools like rebase, stash, submodules, or interactive rebasing introduce steep learning curves—especially for new or non-technical team members. If your team seeks simplicity over flexibility, it may be a sign to explore alternatives.

Centralized Workflow Preferences

Some organizations require centralized workflows over Git’s distributed model. They might prefer systems like Mercurial (with a more centralized feel) or Perforce (with strict file locking and central control), which provide simpler audit trails and streamlined permissions.

Seamless Integration With Developer Tools

Some platforms offer version control tightly integrated with specific IDEs or cloud environments, making Git feel disjointed. Alternative systems can offer better out-of-the-box integration, fewer configuration steps, and improved user experiences.

2. Top Git Alternatives

Mercurial (hg)

• Overview: Another mature, cross-platform DVCS focusing on simplicity and intuitive UI.
• Advantages:
  • Cleaner command set (hg commit, hg push, hg pull)
  • Centralized feel with optional hosting (Bitbucket, Heptapod)
  • Supports large repo workflows
• Drawbacks:
  • Smaller community than Git
  • Integrations are less ubiquitous

Perforce Helix Core (P4)

• Overview: A centralized VCS used widely in game development, large-scale C/C++ codebases, and media assets.
• Advantages:
  • Excellent large binary and file-locking support
  • High-performance network architecture
• Drawbacks:
  • Proprietary and license-costly
  • Centralized model may not suit distributed teams

Fossil

• Overview: A distributed VCS that includes bug tracking, wiki, and web interface all in one binary.
• Advantages:
  • Self-contained and lightweight
  • Easy setup and low dependency footprint
• Drawbacks:
  • Less mainstream
  • Fewer ecosystem integrations

Monotone / Bazaar / Others

• Older systems with niche features. They may not justify migration due to limited community and tool support.

3. Planning Your Migration

Set Clear Goals

Define why you’re migrating:

• Improved performance?
• Simpler workflows?
• More centralized or permissioned control?
• Better large-file support?

Having specific goals (e.g., reduce pull latency by 50%, simplify onboarding) guides your decisions.

Audit Your Git Repository

• History: Is it clean or full of churn?
• Branching style: Heavy branching, many long-lived branches?
• Large files: Is Git LFS being used? What’s the binary ratio?
• Size: Number of commits, total size in MBs or GBs?

This data helps assess migration complexity, performance needs, and retention strategy.

Choose an Alternative

Match tool features to your requirements:

• Mercurial for distributed support + simplicity
• Perforce for large files + centralized control
• Fossil for integrated toolchain and lightweight local usage

Prototype the Workflow

Test drive migration:

• Clone a sandbox repo into the new VCS
• Perform key workflows: branching, merging, commit history tracking, CI/CD compatibility, file locking, large file handling

4. Migrating to Another VCS

Git → Mercurial

Use hg-fast-export:

1. Clone Git: git clone --bare
2. Convert: hg-fast-export -r repo.git
3. Create Mercurial repo and push
4. Verify history and branch fidelity

Git → Perforce Helix Core

Use git p4 bridge:

1. Check out history: git p4 clone //depot/project/...
2. Review and tune changelists or labels
3. Push to Perforce server
4. Audit results with p4 verify

Alternatively, fresh import works if preserving history isn’t critical.

Git → Fossil

1. Initialize Fossil: fossil init newrepo.fossil
2. Use helper scripts (git-fossil, fossil-scm)
3. Verify posts about ticket and file support
4. Push to Fossil server or local binary

5. Ensuring a Smooth Transition

Parallel Operation

While upgrading:

• Allow both Git and new VCS to run
• Mirror Git into the new system or vice versa
• Monitor divergence carefully—automate mirroring to avoid drift

Train and Educate the Team

• Conduct workshops on commands and flows
• Provide transition guides and cheat sheets
• Assign “VC champions” to support

Update DevOps Pipeline

• CI systems (e.g. Jenkins, GitHub Actions) expect Git. Update them for:
  • Mercurial plugin
  • Helix Core’s P4 Plugin
  • Fossil checkout steps
• Update issue trackers and CI URLs to reference new system

Archive Git Snapshot

• Tag a final Git state
• Export to tarball for compliance/audit
• Document the transition in README or CHANGELOG

6. Common Migration Challenges & Solutions

Large Repository Migration

With repositories over tens of gigabytes:

• Split large assets into separate repos
• Use file‑locking enabled systems like Perforce
• Run incremental migration to test performance

Merging Histories

Maintaining commit hashes isn’t always feasible. Mitigate:

• Use rebase-like conversions
• Include commit metadata manually
• Accept approximate equivalence with matching author dates/messages

Training Gaps

Develop clear learning materials:

• “Mercurial for Git Users”
• Helix Core quickstart lead
• Practical demos and pair programming

CI Integration Issues

• Pipelines built for Git may fail on new VCS; update checkout and test steps
• Ensure testing agents are compatible with new tools
• Reconfigure permissions/auth tokens

7. Post-Migration: Measuring Success

Performance Metrics

Track over time:

• Checkout/pull/clone times
• CPU & memory usage during diffs
• Storage consumption
• CI pipeline duration

Developer Feedback

Survey the team:

• Onboarding experience
• Command ease-of-use
• Branching/merging simplicity
• Build and test feedback

Issue Tracking and Quality

Monitor:

• Lost commits or file history issues
• Broken links in documentation
• External API links needing updates

8. Case Study Examples

Game Studio Migrating to Perforce

• Steps: eval repo → fast-import + file splitting → user training → locked-asset workflows
• Impact: Improved performance by 60%, virtual binary branching, finer user permissions

Research Team Moving to Mercurial

• Needed simpler workflows: switched via hg‑git plugin
• GitLab → Bitbucket instance
• Improved commit velocity and reduced branch confusion

9. Is Switching Worth It?

When Switch Makes Sense

• Repo >5 GB with many binaries
• Team struggling with Git complexity
• Central control or file-locking a priority

When to Stick with Git

• Repo <1 GB and straightforward workflow
• Strong CI & tooling built around Git
• Team comfortably skilled in Git

Alternatives to Full Migration

If a full transition is excessive, consider:

• Git LFS for large files
• Submodule/Subtree for repo modularization
• Git hosting services with enhanced UI and permission controls

Frequently Asked Question

Why would a team consider moving away from Git?

Teams may move away from Git due to performance issues with large repositories, binary file handling limitations, complex workflows, or the need for centralized control, file locking, or tighter integration with specialized development tools.

What are the most common alternatives to Git?

Popular alternatives include:

• Mercurial (hg) – simpler CLI and more intuitive branching
• Perforce Helix Core – great for large binary assets and centralized control
• Fossil – lightweight with built-in bug tracking and wiki
• Unity Version Control (formerly Plastic SCM) – tailored for game and large asset development

Can I keep my Git history when migrating to another version control system?

Yes, most tools (e.g., hg-fast-export, git-p4) allow you to preserve full commit history during migration. However, metadata fidelity (like hashes and tags) may vary depending on the target system.

How does migrating from Git impact CI/CD pipelines?

You’ll need to update:

• Repository checkout commands
• Authentication methods
• Webhooks or triggers
• Build/test stages if tied to Git-specific workflows
  CI/CD systems like Jenkins, Azure DevOps, and TeamCity support multiple VCS, but configuration updates will be required.

Can Git and the new system run in parallel during transition?

Yes. Many teams mirror Git and the new system during a transitional period. This helps test workflows, validate the new system, and minimize risk before fully cutting over.

What challenges should I expect during migration?

Common issues include:

• Tooling incompatibility (e.g., IDEs or CI integrations)
• Loss of custom Git hooks or scripts
• Team resistance due to unfamiliarity
• Complex merge history or submodules not translating cleanly

Is it worth switching if Git mostly works for us?

Not always. If Git meets your performance, collaboration, and scaling needs, sticking with it may be best. Migration makes the most sense when Git actively slows workflows or fails to meet key requirements (e.g., asset locking, massive binaries, centralized control).

Conclusion

While Git remains a powerful and widely adopted version control system, it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. Teams facing challenges with large repositories, complex workflows, or the need for centralized control may find real value in exploring alternatives like Mercurial, Perforce, Fossil, or Unity Version Control. Transitioning away from Git isn’t a decision to take lightly—it requires careful planning, team training, and technical migration. But for organizations whose needs aren’t fully met by Git, making the switch can lead to faster workflows, improved collaboration, and a better overall developer experience.